Entreprenuership and culture
Publication does not imply endorsement of views by the World Economic Forum.
Share this:. If it does, what kind of culture?
The impact of cultural factors of entrepreneurial performance
Cultural transmission is Beckerian, i. This within-family cultural transmission is not perfect but it does create inertia: children tend to follow in the footsteps of their parents, and a society with less entrepreneurship today is likely to remain so in the future. In a recent paper we argue that differences in economic development across countries can be explained by a culture of entrepreneurship, that there is a role for government policy to shift culture towards risk-taking and innovation but that, ultimately, culture is subordinate to institutions. We also discuss empirical studies documenting the importance of culture and preference heterogeneity for economic growth. And when incentives change, culture responds. Theory needs to take a more general approach. Explore the latest strategic trends, research and analysis Economists have been increasingly looking at culture to explain the divergent economic fortunes of nations. In our model an entrepreneur is someone who has developed certain skills or attitudes that enable him to identify arbitrage opportunities and bear the associated risks. Similarly, wage-working parents having developed skills in their line of work and some aversion to risk may endow their children with human capital that predisposes them toward low risk activities. Consequently industrial policy was first oriented towards complementing or creating the domestic entrepreneurial base, through facilitating the entry of foreign entrepreneurship and providing financial support to allow entrepreneurs to take on more risk in imitating and adopting foreign technology or by forcing firms to enter new industries.
Institutional changes — economic openness most obviously — can raise returns to entrepreneurship in a population that has acquired considerable proficiency in worn-out methods of production. And when incentives change, culture responds. We also discuss empirical studies documenting the importance of culture and preference heterogeneity for economic growth.
This choice is shaped by cultural factors. Our dynamic theory of culture and development has two implications. By increasing the opportunities associated with taking big risks, or pushing existing businesses to engage in new activities, incredible growth opportunities are created.
We present a model of endogenous technical change where growth is driven by the innovative activity of entrepreneurs. People, who otherwise would have opted for the relative safety of paid employment, turn entrepreneurial, eager to bear large risks because established entrepreneurs no longer have an absolute advantage in the new opportunities.
Perception of entrepreneurial risk is partly influenced by family background, as children from entrepreneurial backgrounds are more likely to be better informed about such activities.
The first is formalized as a general anti-capitalist attitude among workers and traditional sectors, an attitude that we think has been a natural byproduct of exploitative colonialism in the developing world. Entrepreneurship is risky and requires investments that affect the steepness of the lifetime consumption profile.
In Singapore and South Korea, the entrepreneurial base was judged to be lacking initially.
based on 6 review